A review is needed when there are doubts about a completed report: the expert failed to examine important materials, drew conclusions without verification, went beyond the questions or made technically contradictory findings.
Checks cover methodology, examination completeness, the connection between conclusions and the objects examined, terminology, data sufficiency and the reasoning behind each answer.
A review does not replace a new examination, but helps identify weaknesses in the report and support an application for an additional or repeat examination.
What to do before contacting us
- preserve original files and documents;
- avoid unnecessary changes to storage media and data;
- prepare a list of questions;
- state whether the examination is required for court proceedings or before litigation.
What a review checks
The assessment covers competence, completeness of source data, methods used, reproducibility of actions, the logical connection between examination and conclusions, and answers to the questions raised.
Common shortcomings
- conclusions without examining original files or the system;
- replacing technical assessment with legal assertions;
- unspecified software versions and test conditions;
- disregarding some case materials;
- unreproducible tests and missing records.
What the deliverable is
A review provides a professional analysis of the report, a list of significant comments and an explanation of how the identified shortcomings may affect the substantiation of its conclusions.
How to use a review
The document may accompany objections or an application to summon the expert or order an additional or repeat examination, and may be used to prepare questions for examination of the expert in court.
How work with a specialist proceeds
First, the task and available materials undergo a preliminary review. The examination subject, technically appropriate questions, required access and deliverable format are then agreed. If the initial data are insufficient, the specialist identifies in advance which additional files, documents or exports must be preserved.
The final opinion distinguishes the information provided, actions performed, indicators established, limitations and conclusions. This structure makes the reasoning verifiable and enables the document to be used in a formal claim, negotiations or court proceedings.
When to seek advice in advance
The earlier original data are preserved, the lower the risk of loss or alteration. Before reinstalling a system, updating software, clearing logs or handing a device over for repair, it is advisable to discuss how the materials should be recorded.